Spring Term A.D. 1882
   May 30th Tuesday A.D. 1882
this day this Cause coming on to be heard and
the Defendant saying nothing in bar or preclusion
of the Plaintiffs right to recover.
                           Whereupon it ordered by
the Court that the Clerk do assess the dam-
ages.
Whereupon the Clerk having assessed the Damages
at Nine hundred and Seventy Seven Dollars and
Seventy Four cents. it is therefore considered ad-
judged and ordered by the Court that the Plain
tiffs do have and recover of and from the Defen-
dant the said Sum of Nine hundred and Seventy Sev-
en Dollars and Seventy Seven Cents together
with their costs in this behalf expended
taxed at Seventeen  Dollars and
Eighteen cents and the Defendant in
Mercy &c

Wilbur F. Rice            }  Taylor & Sanchez
         vs               }  asspt
J.C. Hunt & J.A. Voorhees }  Thrasher & Hampton &
partners doing business   }  Roysden
under the firm name of    }
Hunt and Voorhees         }
                          } And now this Cause Com-
ing on to be heard and the parties Plaintiff and
defendants appearing by their respective attorneys
and the issues being joined whereupon a Jury was
called and there came 1 S.O. Zetrouer 2 Wm Stroble
3 Henry McKay 4 Jesse M. Shaw 5 T.W. Zetrouer and
6 F.X. Miller who were duly sworn and empanelled
to well and truly try the diference pending and
thereafter after hearing the Evidence the argument
of Counsel and the Charge of the Court retired
under the Charge of J.J. Kennard who had been duly
sworn as bailiff to said Jury to consider of their
verdict and thereafter on the Same day Cane
into open Court and rendered the following
verdict to wit:            }
Wilbur F. Rice  Plaintiff  }
              vs           }  Verdict of Jury
Hunt & Voorhees Defendants }
                           } We the Jury find
for the Plaintiff and assess his damages