Fall Term A.D. 1884
     Thursday December 18th 1884
Jury aforesaid after hearing the balance of the
evidence the argument of Counsel and the
Charge of the Court retired to consider of
their verdict and thereafter on the same day
returned into open Court and rendered the
following verdict to wit: We the Jury find for
the plaintiff and assess the damages at Seventy
dollars.  W.S. Land  foreman
Gainesville Fla Decr 1884.
Whereupon it is ordered considered and adjudged by the
Court that the plaintiff do have and recover of and
from the Defendants the Sum of Seventy Dollars,
for his damages together with his costs in this be-
half expended taxed at Thirty Six ~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~ Dollars and Seventy ~~~~
~~~~~~ Cents and the Defendants in
Mercy &c

Fannie R. Mills and    }
Wm R. Mils her husband }  Finley & Hampton
          vs           }  Ejectment
James P. Bauknight     }  Ashby & Thrasher
                       }
                        And now the hearing of
this Cause is resumed whereupon by Consent
of Counsel for both plaintiff and Defendant
the Jury is dismissed and this Cause con-
tinued

Ida E. Burnett and            }   Taylor & Sanchez
Samuel J. Burnett her husband } 
             vs               }  Ejectment
Louisa Blue                   }  J.J. & S.Y. Finley
                              }
                             And now this Cause
coming on to be heard and the parties plain-
tiff and defendant being now in open Court by
their respective attorneys, and the issues being
joined a Jury was called and there came
E.C. Beach, S.J. Peeler, W.D. Seigler, R.C. Davis
Jas H. Jarvis, J.G. Stokes, who were duly
Sworn and empanelled to well and truly
try the issues joined and thereafter after
hearing the evidence the argument of