Fall Term A.D. 1887
       Tuesday December 13th 1887

       Gustave Eckstein & Co }
# 28             vs          }
       Woodworth & Tuely     }
                              And now the Court doth
       decide on the motion to Dissolve the at-
       tachment in this Cause and the motion
       to Dismiss this cause that the said motions be
       granted to which the Plaintiff then and there
       in open Court by his Counsel excepted

       Gustave Eckstein & Co }  E.C.F. Sanchez
# 16             vs          }  asspt by attachment
       S.M. Woodworth        }  Hampton & Hampton
(Idx)                           And now this Cause
       Came on to be heard on an affidavit traversing
       the affidavit for attachment herein and the
       parties plaintiff and Defendant being in
       open Court by their respective attys and the
       issue being joined a Jury was called and there
       Came W.B. Patterson - Frank X. Miller M.A. Densler
       T.M. Cauthen, J.E. Haynesworth, P.M. Colson who
       were duly Sworn and empanelled to well and truly
       Say whether the Plaintiffs had good reason
       to believe that the Defendant would fraudulently
       part with his property before Judgment Could
       be obtained against him and thereafter after
       hearing the evidence the argument of Counsel
       and the Charge of the Court retired to Consider
       of their Verdict and thereafter on the Same day
       returned into open Court and rendered the
       following verdict to wit: We the Jury find
       Verdict for plaintiff  So say we all
                              T.M. Cauthen  Foreman
                              F.X. Miller
                              P.M. Colson
                              W.B. Patterson
                              M.A. Densler
                              J.E. Haynesworth