Spring Term A.D. 1889
      Thursday June 20th 1889 -
on the same day returned into open Court and
rendered the following verdict to wit:-
We the Jury do not believe contract was broken
by Defendant & that Plaintiff is not entitled
to amount claimed unless Contract is
Complied with so say we all
                        W.W. Scott
                           Foreman
Whereupon it is ordered Considered and
adjudged by the Court that the Defendants
be dismissed without day and that said
Defendants do have and recover of and from
the Plaintiff the sum of
        Dollars and             cents -
their costs in this behalf expended -

Joseph Hirst as      }
pro chien ami for    }
Walter J. Hirst      }  Taylor & Sanchez
        vs           }  Motion for New Trial
The Florida Southern }
Railway Company      }  R.W. Davis & J.R. Parrott
                          and now this cause
came on to be heard on a Motion for a
New Trial in this Cause and after argument
had thereon and now the Court being advised of
His opinion doth decide that Said motion
for a new trial shall be denied to which
opinion and ruling of the Court the Defendant
by its attorneys in open Court then and there
excepted -

Circuit Court 5th Judicial Circuit Alachua
                County - Spring Term - 1889 -
Joseph Hirst as pro chien        }
ami for Walter J. Hirst          }
           vs                    }  Entry of appeal
The Florida Southern Railway Co. }
                                  And now at the
term of the Court aforesaid comes the defendant
by its attorneys J.R. Parrott and Robt W. Davis
and in open Court applies for and enters
its appeal from the Judgment herein rendered
to the Supreme Court of the State of Florida