In the Circuit Court of Florida 5th Judicial
                      Circuit in and for Alachua County
Herbert Shooter and Charles C. Shooter      }          In chancery
              vs                            } Bill to Foreclose Mortgage
L.W. Fennell as Sheriff of Alachua County   }
Florida and Ex Officio Administrator of and }
for the Estate of James B. Cullen, deceased } Decree Pro Confesso
and Stephen B. Cullen                       }
                 This cause coming on to be further heard and it
appearing that an order was made herein on the 2nd day of March
AD 1900 overruling and denying the pleas filed by the defendant L.W.
Fennell as Sheriff of Alachua County Florida and Ex officio Administrator
of and for the estate of James B. Cullen, deceased, therein requiring
the said defendant to answer complainants bill on or before the 15th
day of March AD 1900 and said defendant having failed to answer
said bill as required by the order of the court and the complainants
solicitor moving for a decree pro confesso for failure to file
such answer, and the court being advised in the premises
thereupon, upon consideration hereof, it is ordered, adjudged
and decreed that a decree pro confesso be and the same is herein
and hereby entered up against the defendant L.W. Fennell as Sheriff
of Alachua County Florida, and ex officio administrator of and
for the estate of James B. Cullen deceased for failure to file answer
to complainants bill of complaint as required by the court, and that
complainants have leave to make proof of the allegations of their
bill exparte, and for such other and further decree herein as
may be deemed proper.
Done and ordered at Chambers at Ocala, Florida on this 23 day
of March AD 1900
                                 W.A. Hocker
Filed March 24th 1900                   Judge
            Recorded March 27th 1900
                        H.C. Denton Clerk
                       pr S.H. Wienges DC

          In the Circuit Court of Florida 5th Judicial Circuit
          in and for Alachua County  In Chancery
R.W Higdon           }
     vs              } Bill for Injunction etc
C.W. Bauknight et al } Decree Dismissing Bill Etc
        This cause coming on to be heard and the defendant
having set the same down for final hearing upon the bill and
answer of Charles W. Bauknight and the replication thereto and the
same having been argued and submitted by the defendants on the day
named in the Notice and the court being advised in the premises;
and complainants solicitor having asked a few days leave to
argue the case for the complainants and having failed at this