Wednesday 11th December 1850

John Doe (i.e. Joel B. Smith)  }                C.L. Mitchell for Pltff
             vs                }  Ejectment
Richard Roe (i.e. David Weeks) |                S. Spencer for Deft.

On motion of the Plaintiff's Counsel it is ordered that this cause be dismissed

Moses E. Levy   }
     vs         }  Assumpsit
David Weeks     }
               
                The Like Rule

State of Florida}
      vs        }  Adultery and Fornication
Lewis Sparkman  }
                   On motion of J.P. Sanderson Esqr. Solicitor, this
cause is ordered to be continued, and a Pluries writ to be issued.

    Same     }
      vs     }  Resisting Execution of process
    Same     }
                The Like Rule

State of Florida }
      vs         }  Keeping a gambling House
George M. Galpin }
                  For sufficient cause shown, and on motion of the Counsel for
Defendant it is ordered that this cause be continued to next term and that the
Defendant pay the costs of this case for the present term.

State of Florida  }
      vs          }  Assault and Battery
John C. Hately    }
                   Now on this day comes J.P. Sanderson Esqr who prose-
cutes the plea of the State in this behalf and the said Defendant John C.
Hately, who on being arraigned pleaded not Guilty to the indictment against
him, and for his trial put himself upon the country whereupon came a Jury
to wit: