Tuesday May 13th A.D. 1856

Boston and Villalonga            }         Coker
             plffs in fi fa      }
         vs                      }        Fi fa & Claim
T.J. Prevatt & Co.               }
             Defts in fi fa      }
James Kenard                     }        M. Whit Smith
             Claimant            }
               Upon the calling of this cause It is agreed and
consented by the parties to this suit that the property levied on
is Subject to said Execution, Whereupon It is ordered considered
and adjudged by the Court that the execution do proceed and
that the Claimant so pay the costs of said claim.


Boston & Villalonga         }    Coker
            plffs in fi fa  }     Fi fa & Claim
        vs                  }
T.J. Prevatt & Co.          }
            Defts in fi fa  }
Jerome N. Jones             }    M. Whit Smith
            Claimant        }     Jury Trial
         And now on this day came the plaintiffs in fi fa by
their attorney as well as the Claimant and thereupon came a Jury
to wit
1  David Mizelle                      7   Wm S. Malphurs
2  M.D. Colson                        8   D.W. Mizell
3  Henry Moore                        9   Henry Snowden
4  A.G. Roberts                       10  R.R. Hines
5  Wm F. Perry                        11  Wm O. Clegg
6  Daniel Lynn                        12  Samuel L. Cook
Who being duly sworn well and truly to try the right of property
between the parties, and after hearing the Testimony of Witnesses the argu-
ment of Counsel and the charge of the Court, retired to consider their
Verdict, and afterward and upon the same day, said Jurors returned
into Court, and Entered the following verdict to wit: We the Jury
find the property in dispute subject to the Execution, Whereupon
It is ordered considered and adjudged that said plaintiffs do pro-
ceed with their fi fa, and that they do recover of and from the
Claimant their costs in this behalf Expended Taxed at
                  Dollars and             cents &c